Blue Shield of California Foundation Focuses On Mission With New Grants Management Software
As the Blue Shield of California Foundation began to grow and learn from and interact more with their grantmaking data, Grants and Contracts Manager...
Be the first to know about new Fluxx grants management resources, blog articles and podcasts.
Grant management does not stop after the grant is awarded. For this reason, post-award management of funds is complex and a very critical stage that needs efficient reporting, compliance tracking, and tight data management. Choosing the right post-award grant management software will be instrumental in helping organizations achieve these goals and deliver maximum impact while upholding stakeholder expectations. This guide examines the key considerations necessary in the selection of a software solution that aligns with every organizational aim, compliance need, and flow of operation.
Post-award grant management involves the processes, activities, and requirements that an organization must fulfill when it receives an award. The act of securing funding is crucial, but effective post-award management will ensure that funding has the intended impact and meets both organizational and funder goals. Activities included in this phase entail observation of progress made on projects, compliance with funding terms or conditions, budget management, and outcome tracking. Through systematic reporting and data collection, an organization can easily communicate to stakeholders the impact of the grant, therefore making the funding process easy and maximizing future grant applications.
Selecting a post-award grant management software is a multi-dimensional decision. A fitting solution would not only serve compliance and reporting but also raise the general workflow efficiency with data integrity. The following are to be considered major points for any organization while choosing between a post-award grant management platform.
Some of the most resource-heavy areas of post-award grant management are compliance, especially where an organization has to deal with a large number of funders or the use of federal monies that are very heavily regulated. A good grant post-award software should have the capabilities to:
Example: A state agency administering grants for public health programs can automate reporting with the federal agencies by using templates tracking key metrics that would automatically alert staff if data was missing that was needed for compliance.
This can be frustrating and often not very effective for grant managers to have to jump around in different software platforms and systems. Knowing a new post-award management solution can integrate with core systems, such as accounting, CRM, or donor management, greatly enhances efficiency and accuracy of data. Look for software featuring:
Example: This could be where a foundation integrates its grant management software with its accounting system; once all the financial information is updated, it automatically updates, reflecting changes within the accounting system itself, which reduces duplicate data entry and minimizes human errors.
Difficult-to-use software decreases team productivity and increases the potential for mistakes. When selecting a post-award grant management tool, consider its ease of use to include:
Example: A nonprofit with limited staff can streamline the onboarding process for grantees by selecting software with built-in tutorials and support, reducing onboarding time for new team members and improving long-term adoption.
The post-award grant management invariably copes with sensitive data, ranging from financial records up to the personal data of grantees. With ever-stricter regulations on data privacy, one of the most important features to consider in software selection is data security. Your chosen platform should be able to give:
Example: A health-focused foundation can have a high degree of confidence in storing personal data on grantees within its grant management software, knowing data meets the standards of GDPR and all user actions are tracked for full transparency.
The growth of an organization often changes grant management needs, so this requires choosing a scalable post-award solution. Seek out software that can adapt to:
Example: A regional grantmaker may start by implementing the core set of functionalities and, over time, as new grants and workflows are added, scale the system to expand the platform with its mission.
Funders and stakeholders increasingly expect comprehensive impact reporting. An advanced, data-analytics-enabled post-award grant management solution will let you effectively measure and communicate your impact through:
Example: An education grant-focused organization can track changes in such student performance metrics across schools in which funding was provided by its grants. It then displays such insights on dashboards and charts for easy access to stakeholders.
While cost is always a factor, it really is value where post-award grant management software provides efficiency and capability. Consider initial costs against ROI for improved workflow, compliance, and reporting efficiency or requirements for reporting when weighing options that fit your needs. Key areas of costs to consider include the following:
Example: A nonprofit may choose software with a subscription fee slightly above its budget because that particular software comes with robust customer support and training, saving costs in terms of time and operations in the long run.
Fluxx is an all-round suite of solutions for the peculiar problems of grant management in the post-award process, focusing on compliance, ease of use, and scalability. Equipped with rich analytics and impact-tracking data, Fluxx allows organizations to meet their reporting needs and better communicate their impact to their stakeholders. It can be seamlessly integrated with systems and ensure smooth data interchange across platforms. User-friendly interfaces backed by training support ensure a very high level of adoption across teams. Fluxx is adaptive, secure, and scalable, responding to the demands of a growing organization and ensuring long-term value in your grant management process.
Selection of the appropriate post-award grant management software is a strategic decision wherein simplification of operations can be provided, reporting accuracy enhanced, and compliance improved. An organization will ultimately be in a position to find a solution—not just to simplify post-award processes but also to further a more impactful grant management program—by evaluating options for compliance capability, integration, usability, security, scalability, analytics, and cost. In essence, with the right software in place, you enable your team to focus their efforts on the most important thing: making real, tangible change with every grant awarded.
Ready to see how Fluxx can revolutionize your post-award grant management? Click to schedule a call today!
As the Blue Shield of California Foundation began to grow and learn from and interact more with their grantmaking data, Grants and Contracts Manager...
Streamlined grantmaking solutions save money and maximize impact, offering cost savings through automation and efficient data management.
Last month we shared our evolving vision for Fluxx: A philanthropy platform enabling funding and impact for organizations who fund change, and those...
Be the first to know about new Fluxx grants management resources, blog articles and podcasts.